« Hens | Main | Strikes Are Stupid And Dangerous And Never Work »
Thursday, December 11, 2008
How Gay Was Yesterday?
A daylong work stoppage for which people were encouraged to call in "gay" to express support for same-sex marriage drew spotty participation Wednesday, with some gay rights activists praising the event and others questioning its value.
People who opted to take the day off from their jobs as part of the national "Day Without a Gay" were encouraged to perform community service, and charitable organizations across the country said they had volunteers showing up.
"Visibility is really important for the gay community, so after a lot of thought I decided I would come out and be visible with my colleagues at work and use the time working for the community," said Carrie Lewis, 36, a University of California health researcher who spent the day working at the Sacramento Gay and Lesbian Center.
The protest, which a gay couple from West Hollywood organized through the Internet, was designed to demonstrate the economic clout of same-sex marriage supporters following the passage of voter-approved gay marriage bans in California, Arizona and Florida last month.
Participants also were asked to refrain from spending money or at least to patronize gay-friendly businesses for the day.
...
Out and Equal Workplace Advocates, a San Francisco-based nonprofit group that promotes equality for gay and lesbian employees, suggested that gay marriage supporters could send an effective message beyond Wednesday by openly discussing the issue at their workplaces.The organization was encouraging gay people who could not miss work to be open about their sexual orientation with co-workers and urging straight employees to speak up when they hear colleagues making homophobic jokes.
...
Backers of "Day Without a Gay" organized evening rallies in San Francisco, Austin, Tex., Logan, Utah, and other cities so supporters could gather to discuss the next steps. Rallies also were held earlier Wednesday in Chicago and on several college campuses in California."The movement that fought for equality and succeeded in electing Obama president is really looking to make progressive gains now," said Mark Airgood, who used a personal day to take off from his job as a middle school teacher in Berkeley. "I think we really can, and I think this is an important day for that."
Not sure what "spotty" means without any data. Regardless, the point is that the story is out and that this was a first step in escalating the efforts for equal rights.
ntodd
December 11, 2008 in Why We Fight | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c525c53ef0105365461b1970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference How Gay Was Yesterday?:
Comments
Hi, I'm back!
Sorry, dude, but that was a major fail.
"Participants also were asked to refrain from spending money or at least to patronize gay-friendly businesses for the day."
So, it was a strike-against-straights day, but not a strike-against-spending-money-day (money that goes to businesses goes back into the people that voted against your efforts via taxes and pays the politicians salaries that put the laws into place for democratic voting)?
'said Mark Airgood, who used a personal day to take off from his job as a middle school teacher in Berkeley.'
As I said: no committment. Personal day fail all the way to failtown.
The worst part about your self-indulgent rantings about being a "Straight" and gays having the rough life is that you simply don't have the balls to make a stand with your beliefs.
You said that this was a tactically superior battle for good, but you cannot find it in your mantra to condemn those that did not participate, nor those that chose TO TAKE A PERSONAL day.
Nor do I see a big post about what you did on the 10th? Did you "strike"? Did you go and help the homeless or the poor? What did you do? I shouldn't even have to ask that because had you the actual courage, real courage defined by your actions more than your words, you would have posted how you organized a rally in your back yard, or your town center, or a candlelight vigil, or whatever non-hypocritical, uber liberals do for the causes they see as relevant.
Oh, wait, you did do something! You posted a link about it!
Disappointed, man. Very dissapointed. I was hoping that I would be proven wrong.
As I said: right war, wrong time. Tactically inferior battle.
Oh, and about your QED example about a "strike" involved a Union. Unions have power, dude. Real power. Too much power. I don't know what the law stipulates, but it appears they won their battle because of the flawed methodology of the company that requires them to give 60 days notice.
So, yeah, their strike was about receiving compensation that apparently was agreed to in a binding contract.
But, then, there is the example of the Air Traffic Controllers. Remember them? They stiked and they got fired...during a recession. How odd.
http://eightiesclub.tripod.com/id296.htm
Posted by: Anonymouse | Dec 12, 2008 9:59:34 PM
Sorry, dude, but that was a major fail.
Only if you're a smug asshole and don't try to understand the difference between tactic and strategy, and how you build on campaigns.
"Participants also were asked to refrain from spending money or at least to patronize gay-friendly businesses for the day."
So, it was a strike-against-straights day, but not a strike-against-spending-money-day (money that goes to businesses goes back into the people that voted against your efforts via taxes and pays the politicians salaries that put the laws into place for democratic voting)?
Clearly you have a reading comp problem. Notice "or at least..."
As I said: no committment. Personal day fail all the way to failtown.
As I said, it was one event to raise awareness, not instantly change the current legal status or anything.
The worst part about your self-indulgent rantings about being a "Straight" and gays having the rough life is that you simply don't have the balls to make a stand with your beliefs.
Yes, I understand thinking that makes you feel good.
You said that this was a tactically superior battle for good, but you cannot find it in your mantra to condemn those that did not participate, nor those that chose TO TAKE A PERSONAL day.
Gandhi did not condemn people, and recognized that we all have parts of the Truth. He even noted that if one cannot commit to something like satyagraha, one should engage however their conscience dictates short of the ideal. But to at least be active.
Nor do I see a big post about what you did on the 10th? Did you "strike"?
You certainly miss a lot of subtleties, eh? I did strike and boycott.
Disappointed, man. Very dissapointed. I was hoping that I would be proven wrong.
And your approval is very important to me.
Oh, and about your QED example about a "strike" involved a Union. Unions have power, dude. Real power. Too much power. I don't know what the law stipulates, but it appears they won their battle because of the flawed methodology of the company that requires them to give 60 days notice.
Hence, they chose a tactic that won their aims, using the power they had.
But, then, there is the example of the Air Traffic Controllers. Remember them? They stiked and they got fired...during a recession. How odd.
Sometimes you lose battles, it turns out. Or perhaps you never learned that. My suggestion, rather than lashing out against something like this, take the time to learn about it first. Then you won't come off as an ignorant, self-interested, smug asshole.
Posted by: NTodd | Dec 13, 2008 12:53:59 AM
Give 'em hell, NTodd, and thanks for pointing out Gandhian reasoning to that ignorant man. Very proud of you and all the hetero allies who took part in whatever way worked for you.
Posted by: natalie davis | Dec 13, 2008 1:21:35 PM



