« Witch's Trinity | Main | Speaking Of Teh Gaiii »

Thursday, October 11, 2007

Speaking Of Nobel And Literature

Well, I've blogged about Al Gore and his potential Peace Prize as well as my dear old college friend Erika's novel about witch trials, so I might as well continue the trend with a synthesis: I see Doris Lessing has become only the 11th female ever to win the Nobel Prize for Literature.  That's wicked cool.

Yet another favorite person from my days at Colby, Jenny Boylan, gives me a moment of pause:

I remember reading “The Golden Notebook” when I was 21; I’d been given it by a good female friend, one of those people who may have had some fundamental understanding of my trans nature without our having an intimate talk about it.

But what I remember is a profound sense of sadness from Golden Notebook, and particularly a scene in which the heroine finds her flat-mate, Ronnie, in the bathroom, using her moisturizer. It’s not clear to me if Ronnie is meant to be trans, or a gay man, or some combination of both, but our fightin’ feminist heroine is, in any case, repulsed, grossed out, and contemptuous of him.

“… Anna, speaking out of her disgust, was ashamed of doing so before the words were out. Good Lord! she thought, to be born a Ronnie! to be born like that– I complain about the difficulties of being my kind of woman, but Good Lord! I might have been born a Ronnie!”

So. There you have it.

Today I will join in with other feminist women around the world in being glad for Doris Lessing, and glad for us all.

Except: I wonder if anyone, in the accolades which are sure to shower down on her in days to come, will note this cruel swipe at trans people? And feel bad about it? In just the way I felt bad about it, as a twenty-one year old feminist transwoman, looking for someone who might give voice to the things I felt in my heart, and heard, from my heroines, only disgust and shame.

I ain't got nuthin' profound to say, and besides, does anybody really need to hear what a hetero puke male has on his mind anyway? 

I'll just note that this comes right after my friends Molly and Racy Mind have blogged about sad developments regarding ENDA as I've been reading sci-fi by Suzy McKee Charnas (sorta the anti-Heinlein) that my friend (geesh, whodathunk I'd have so many friends, and not even imaginary ones?) Echidne turned me onto.  Oh, and I just had a conversation this weekend with a gay guy who couldn't really help me understand why the GLBT community usually seems to forget the T (and sometimes the B, I've found) when issues of civil rights and stuff come up.

I guess it's just a natural part of the human condition to be loyal to a narrowly-defined group and not really give a rat's ass about others in a similar situation.  Or something.

ntodd

October 11, 2007 in Life Is A Chick Flick | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c525c53ef00e54ef618668833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Speaking Of Nobel And Literature:

Comments

Except: I wonder if anyone, in the accolades which are sure to shower down on her in days to come, will note this cruel swipe at trans people?

Oh for Christ sake, this is such a horseshit reaction to that book, and yet typical of those who think literature and art has a duty to be PC. The Golden Notebook is a grueling uncomfortable read about the gradual breakdown of a woman (Anna) who compartmentalizes her life. She is a sympathetic character but not always a likeable one. An insightful reader will pick up on her prejudices and failings.

If this person read enough of her books, or any of them, with any depth, she'd know she's not a "tranny-hater."

Please spare me a world in which authors are relegated to writing fairy tales about the human experience.

Posted by: Lesley | Oct 11, 2007 11:32:29 PM

Um...so you're saying that TG reaction to such things is less valid than the similar offense queers find in literature and real life? I don't think Jenny is saying that books need to PC. She's simply observing her emotional reaction to the book when she read it before she had transitioned. Emotions aren't horseshit.

Posted by: NTodd | Oct 11, 2007 11:53:34 PM

Emotions aren't horseshit.

words to live by.

Re the issue of "forgetting" B and T when civil rights comes up...

there's "forgetting" and then there's focused and purposeful re-framing, with specific intent, and presenting said re-framing to others as bona fide GLBT gospel. John A can call it "strategery" all he wants but a lot of the rest of us queers aren't buying his horseshit.

FYI, re Boylan, I just lent "She's Not There" to a straight, fairly conservative work-mate. She loved it. Planting seeds

Posted by: virgotex | Oct 12, 2007 10:32:54 AM

Read the sentence: "Except: I wonder if anyone, in the accolades which are sure to shower down on her in days to come, will note this cruel swipe at trans people."

She's clearly giving Lessing some direction here (about a book Lessing published in 1962) and a message about Lessing.

Emotions are what they are, but she's accusing Lessing of cruelty, while completely disregarding the context. I think she's wrong.

Personally, I try not to let emotions overpower good sense and logic. If she knew anything about Lessing at all, she wouldn't have put it that way.


Posted by: Lesley | Oct 12, 2007 1:01:35 PM

Yes, it's so easy to shut off emotions when you're a 21yo TG reading something that makes you feel bad about yourself. Perhaps if YOU knew more about Jenny, you wouldn't call horseshit.

Posted by: NTodd | Oct 12, 2007 1:15:07 PM

Post a comment