« Comity And Controversy | Main | None So Blind As Those Who Will Not See »
Saturday, January 22, 2005
Compare And Contrast
Lincoln's second inaugural address:
At this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential office there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented. The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.
...
Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether."With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.
Bush's second inaugural address:
At this second gathering, our duties are defined not by the words I use, but by the history we have seen together. For a half century, America defended our own freedom by standing watch on distant borders. After the shipwreck of communism came years of relative quiet, years of repose, years of sabbatical - and then there came a day of fire.
...We go forward with complete confidence in the eventual triumph of freedom. Not because history runs on the wheels of inevitability; it is human choices that move events. Not because we consider ourselves a chosen nation; God moves and chooses as He wills. We have confidence because freedom is the permanent hope of mankind, the hunger in dark places, the longing of the soul. When our Founders declared a new order of the ages; when soldiers died in wave upon wave for a union based on liberty; when citizens marched in peaceful outrage under the banner "Freedom Now" - they were acting on an ancient hope that is meant to be fulfilled. History has an ebb and flow of justice, but history also has a visible direction, set by liberty and the Author of Liberty.
When the Declaration of Independence was first read in public and the Liberty Bell was sounded in celebration, a witness said, "It rang as if it meant something." In our time it means something still. America, in this young century, proclaims liberty throughout all the world, and to all the inhabitants thereof. Renewed in our strength - tested, but not weary - we are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom.
Discuss.
ntodd
January 22, 2005 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c525c53ef00d8346eb35269e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Compare And Contrast:
Comments
discuss? discuss what? empty rhetoric and meaningless drivel? i'm hoping that you aren't inviting comarisons to lincoln's second...safire beat you to it, in any case
Posted by: mpg | Jan 22, 2005 4:04:35 PM
The first is written and given by an individual who was tied to the reality of his time and place. A man who acknowledges that his country is at war; who hopes to see an end to war and a binding of wounds.
The second was written by a committee and spoken by a man who has no knowledge of history or his personal involvement in it. A man who tells us at the beginning of a paragraph that nothing is ordained, and at the end of the same paragraph that it is.
Barely acknowledging the existence of his war, he seeks not peace, but further wars.
The first is a man who started at the bottom and worked his way up, while the second started at the top and, left to his own devices, would be sleeping over a heating vent.
Posted by: Bryan | Jan 22, 2005 4:27:37 PM
mpg - I am inviting comparison to Lincoln, as in "Bush pales in..."
Bryan - spot on.
Posted by: NTodd | Jan 22, 2005 4:52:49 PM
I read that even Peggy *kiss ass* Noonan criticized his speech.
There will be an endless attempt by republicans to rescue George's legacy. They realize it is skating on thin ice right now.
Lincoln's is secure if he can just survive the breezy news that he might have been...ahem, bisexual. :)
Posted by: Alex | Jan 22, 2005 10:24:58 PM
Peggy doesn't lust after his feet like she did Reagan's, so it's understandable.
Posted by: NTodd | Jan 23, 2005 10:46:31 AM



